Kurator · Structured memory for your AI

Turn browsing into a structured knowledge base your AI tools can actually use.

AI memory is only as good as what goes into it. Kurator structures every source the moment you save it — described by your prompt, tagged, attributed — so Claude, ChatGPT, NotebookLM, your website and your RAG stack all draw from the same clean record instead of raw pages.

Free to start · Chrome, Brave, Edge, Arc, Vivaldi, and other Chromium browsers

The moment of savingKurator record
https://journals.example.org/article/evidence-synthesis-ai-extraction

Evaluating AI-assisted data extraction in ecological evidence synthesis

A tab. Nothing here tells you why you opened it, what it argued,
or where it belongs. Close it and it’s gone.

Evaluating AI-assisted data extraction in ecological evidence synthesis

Author Peer-reviewed study
Publisher journals.example.org
Folder Systematic Review / Method
Tags — you set these
evidence synthesisextraction accuracyhuman validation
Description — written on savePrompt: Methodology, sample, limitations

Method. Assessed AI-assisted extraction of 2,079 values across 189 peer-reviewed studies.

Result. 87.8% overall accuracy; under 3% error on categorical descriptors, but 20–30% of quantitative values required correction.

Limitation. Human validation remains necessary for quantitative synthesis.

Described, tagged, filed — one record every AI tool can read.
You decide AI writes

What people say

Curators who stopped losing their research.

Reviews from Kurator and Content Hub users.

I find Kurator to be an incredibly valuable and useful tool in spotting themes and curating findings for my publications. Kurator helps me organize the flux of newsletters, white papers and articles I read daily and organize them thematically, with sourcing — a must for a researcher.
by Idil Miriam Cakim by Idil Miriam Cakim

Perfect to organize stuff, even better at sharing it, and now even in French (localized version)! The tool I miss all these years, and the team behind the tool is also very helpfull. Good pick.

by Bert by Bert

Loving the tool. A much more clever way to bookmark sites (with the possibility to add tags and descriptions). On top of that, it is wonderful to create a curated news channel on any subject you love. Loving it.

by Stephane Feyens by Stephane Feyens

First of all, I like its design for collecting and annotating the web information. And most importantly, I like its curation method.

You can use WordPress plugin to publish your collected information. I personally prefer its embed function because it’s more flexible for virtually any website.

So far, I’m satisfied with its information collection capabilities. And Chinese localization means I can now publish in my native language

The developers were responsive to my feedback and promptly began making improvements.

by Charles Chang by Charles Chang

It is with great enthusiasm that I share my experience with the Kurator app, which has surpassed my expectations by offering a robust platform and invaluable resources for advanced data analytics.

Our team, boasting 40 years of expertise in CPG syndicated data analytics and specializing in product development for targeted regional ROI and actionable insights, can attest to the significant impact Kurator has had on our workflow.

by William Moore by William Moore

I’d been looking for an aggregator plugin for a site I’d been wanting to start, and this one did the trick. It’s easy to set up, and if you run into trouble, the author is available and very willing to assist.

by Bob Sawyer by Bob Sawyer

Brilliant tool with many applications: We all live in a world with too much information to process – and it’s only going to get worse! Kurator is a beautifully simple solution to aggregating and curating info. I ran into an issue and Karan was immediately on it and followed up until resolved. Great support for a great product should rate 10 tacos (5 each!). I wish Karan the best.

by John Frydman by John Frydman

I am required to track the latest developments in national digital policies and strategies. I am very impressed with the capabilities of Kurator and KBucket for capturing and publishing content. I now use Pagescreen to track important websites and capture publication/research links using Kurator. These links can then be published using KBucket on WordPress. Kurator with Pagescreen has been a game-changer for me. I wish Karan the best for the significant enhancements in the pipeline that should take Kurator to an entirely new level.

by Randeep Sudan by Randeep Sudan

Karan offers constant improvements on a very good product. You cannot go wrong with this purchase if you intend and need to aggregate any content and publish/share it.

One thing missing – but Karan said it is possible – is a widget to display the RSS (a third-party RSS reader is for now needed to do so). I would personally prefer to have a way to display a collection on my membership site without the use of another product..like Powr, etc.

That said, you can simply share your collection with anyone by adding their emails (students, teammates, etc.).

Overall this is clearly worth the money!

by Bogdan Heretoiu by Bogdan Heretoiu

We are an elite retirement planning consultancy. Being a trusted source for our prospects and clients is part of our value proposition. A library of curated content readily searchable that is based on third-party articles that we have assessed for accuracy and effectiveness in communication is an important component of being a dependable advisor. We use the KBucket content hub and Kurator to gather, curate, organize and distribute these articles in a simple manner that is both attractive and engaging for our visitors and staff.

by Addie George by Addie George

I’m a US immigration attorney that utilizes Kurator and KBucket to turbocharge my social media content distribution. I curate, comment, and instantly categorize new immigration-related news once, then share it across several platforms. The news I compile also aids me in my profession since all of the material is immediately available and indexable.

by John Manley by John Manley

I teach cybersecurity courses at Syracuse University, and I was seeking a method to better manage our resource library. The fact is that there is so much great information and resources that should be shared and is usually lost when students move on and new students come in. Kurator is a great tool to help us build a resource library.

by Bahram Attaie by Bahram Attaie

At “Show me Victories” we provide strategic communication to our clients. As part of our service, it is essential that we thoroughly research our subjects to gain insight into our strategy for communication. We have been using Kurator for a few months now and it has proven to be a huge time saver over previous methods and tools. I have saved 5 hours a week, curating, organizing, and sharing my research with my team.

By Bryce Summary P.H.D By Bryce Summary P.H.D

A Game Changer for both individuals and companies

I should add that I’ve been a long-time user of Optimal Access curation tools, and our firm has utilized them for several years as a method to simplify access to information for various departments in our organization. We discovered that our employees were able to use the Intranet more efficiently and that customized access to information for certain groups aided their co-workers in training new workers.

By Geoff Tothill By Geoff Tothill

I used Kurator to research information about a Machine Learning subject. I would say the product is user-friendly. I really like how it auto-populates the field before saving. I like that you can share your research with other people on KBucket. Also if more people upload their files and folders I would consider checking them out before starting my own research.

By Yasmin Sahaf By Yasmin Sahaf

Exactly What I’ve Been Looking For!!!!!

As a researcher, the extension is really helpful for me and I just loved it. I’d recommended the extension to anyone. Thanks

By Goutom Kumer By Goutom Kumer

You can spend an hour researching and come away with excellent sources — and then watch all of it vanish.

Vanishes into

A closed tab.

Vanishes into

A bookmark folder you will never reopen.

Vanishes into

A chat history you would have to re-read to mine.

The problem was never finding information. It’s that nothing turns it into memory your AI can reuse — so every new chat starts from raw pages again.

Slop in → slop out

Your AI’s output is only as good as its input.

Hand an AI a raw page and it has to filter ads, filler and transcription errors at the same moment it answers you. That is where generic, confident-sounding slop comes from. We gave Gemini Notebook the same sources twice: once uploaded raw, once structured in Kurator.

Raw upload Structured in Kurator
4vs10
Named platforms surfaced

Asked about AI marketing agents across a year of AI Marketers Guild sessions, the raw notebook named four tools. The structured notebook named ten real platforms and implementations, grouped by discipline.

AI Marketers Guild session archive
Generic
Specific
Same talk, two answers

From one GEO presentation, raw upload produced an executive summary. Structured input surfaced the actual robots.txt fixes, firewall workarounds and a critique of llms.txt — the parts you would act on.

GEO workshop, Passionfruit
~50%
Fewer tokens, names spelled right

A 4,200-word raw transcript became about 2,100 words with speaker labels and timestamps. “Orie” became Augie, and “J gbt” became ChatGPT — errors a raw notebook would have cited back to you.

Product demo workshop transcript

The honest trade-off: structuring compresses, and the raw transcript still wins when you need exact quotes. Every Kurator record keeps its source link, so the original is always one click away.

Same source, two answersExperiment

Capture → Structure → Reuse

Three steps, and only one of them is yours to do.

Kurator is a browser extension. You judge what’s worth keeping. It does everything that has to happen next for that judgment to become memory your AI can still use in six months.

Capture
You act

Anything you can open, you can keep.

Click Kurator on any page and save it as a structured post, not a naked link. Selective by design: memory tools that capture everything spend their life cleaning up duplicates and contradictions. Your library starts high-signal because you chose what got in.

  • Articles, blog posts, docs, and PDFs — the whole page, not a title and a URL.
  • YouTube videos — with full transcripts and timestamps pulled in automatically.
  • AI conversations and research sessions — the output survives the thread.
  • Whole projects — organized into folders and nested collections from the start.
Capture in actionDemo
Structure
AI acts

Every source lands in the same shape.

When you save, Kurator runs your prompt against the content and writes the description — not a generic summary, the exact output shape you defined. Twenty sources come back in one format instead of twenty, which is what makes them usable as memory.

Extract methodology, sample size, and limitationsPull the strategic implications and the risksSummarize for the newsletter, with three candidate headlinesBreak this video into sections with timestamps
  • A prompt library, not a template file — write a prompt in AI Settings, name it, and pick which one runs on each save. Edit it once and every future save uses the new version.
  • Provenance on every record — author, publisher, date and thesis travel with the content, so a vendor’s benchmark never passes as independent fact.
  • Self-contained sections — long content is split by topic, so retrieval pulls the paragraph you need instead of the whole post.
  • Clean long transcripts automatically: strip filler, fix names, section it, extract the recommendations.

You direct. AI does the structuring. Every item lands described, tagged, attributed and searchable — filterable by headline, description, author, publisher, or tag.

Reuse
Everywhere

One record. Every destination.

Built-in AI memory stays locked inside one assistant. Your Kurator library doesn’t. Curate once, and every tool you use reads the same structured record.

Claude and ChatGPT Cloud MCP

Connect either assistant, or both. Each can search, read and write to your folders, run your prompts and file new findings. Ask both the same question of the same folder and see where their answers differ.

Any LLM Filtered export

Filter a folder by tag, author or publisher, export just those records as a file, and upload it to whichever model you’re analyzing with.

NotebookLM Folder sync

Sync selected folders as sources. Edit and re-curate in Kurator and your notebook stays current — you keep editorial control over what goes in.

Your RAG stack Structured feed

Feed clean, pre-chunked records to tools like heycatch or your own retrieval pipeline. Better chunks in, fewer hallucinations out.

KChat Your RAG assistant

Turn any set of folders into the knowledge base for an assistant that answers only from what you trusted enough to save — for you, or for your site’s visitors.

Your website KBucket · vibe-coded sites

Publish a collection to WordPress with KBucket or into a site you built with Lovable-style tools. Each post gets its own server-rendered page, transcript and all — visible to search engines and AI answer engines.

Kurator and Obsidian

Obsidian is where you think. Kurator is where your research goes to work.

Both can clip a page and run a prompt on it as you save. The difference is everything after that: how easily you manage your prompts, find what you saved, and send the same content to every AI tool and site you use.

Obsidian + Web Clipper
Kurator
Your prompts
Obsidian + Web ClipperWritten into clipper templates and settings
KuratorA named prompt library you edit in one place and pick from on each save
Finding what you saved
Obsidian + Web ClipperFiles in a vault, searched as notes
KuratorOrganized folders you can filter by tag, author or publisher and scan at a glance
Analyzing a set of sources
Obsidian + Web ClipperGather the notes yourself, or set up a plugin
KuratorFilter a folder, export it as a file, upload it to any LLM
AI assistants
Obsidian + Web ClipperThrough plugins or a local MCP server you run
KuratorCloud MCP for Claude and ChatGPT, nothing to install
Using more than one AI
Obsidian + Web ClipperSame vault, but a local connector for each app; ChatGPT and web access need a hosted server or sync
KuratorOne hosted connector for Claude and ChatGPT, on desktop, web or phone; compare their answers on the same folder
Publishing and chat
Obsidian + Web ClipperSeparate tools and do-it-yourself
KuratorThe same folders publish to KBucket or a vibe-coded site and power a KChat assistant

Use both. Keep your own thinking in Obsidian. Keep your sources in Kurator, where one curated folder can feed Claude, ChatGPT, NotebookLM, your website and your RAG assistant at once.

Why capture happens in your browser

Your browser gets in. Scrapers don’t.

Every other tool that ingests a URL sends a server to fetch it — and servers get turned away. Kurator reads the page you already have open, logged in, rendered, exactly as you see it. The sources other tools can’t reach are the ones you get to keep.

Browser-side captureDemo
Blocked Paywalled journals and subscription reporting
Blocked Anything behind a login wall
Expires Database links that depend on a session token
Refused Video and talk platforms that turn away crawlers
Saved All of it, from the tab you already have open

Who this is for

Built for the people who already know curation is the bottleneck.

People building AI memory

You’re assembling a second brain, a project memory or a knowledge base for your agents, and you’ve seen what happens when raw pages go in. Kurator makes every source arrive structured and attributed, in folders you can browse, filter and hand to any assistant.

Claude, ChatGPT and MCP power users

You’ve built folders, skills, and a memory file, and the weakest link is still getting clean web sources into them. With both assistants connected to one library, you can check a conclusion in Claude against ChatGPT in minutes.“Getting external web research into that local workspace remains a high-friction process.”

Academic researchers

Papers, gray literature, and policy briefs land described, cited, and filed by chapter — with the source link intact for verification.“Always manually verify your final citation list.”

NotebookLM users

Stop patching six single-purpose extensions together. Curate outside the notebook, sync in what earns its place, and keep your sources portable across notebooks.“Importing web sources directly is hit or miss.”

Product and UX researchers

Secondary research, competitive scans, and interview transcripts extracted against your own taxonomy the moment they’re captured.“Stop wasting research.”

Curators, publishers, and community operators

The same library that answers your questions privately can become a public resource hub, a newsletter, or an assistant your members can ask.“Give your community a reason to come back.”

The loop, running in production

One minute of human judgment per session.

The AI Marketers Guild publishes every weekly session through Kurator. After each one, a person adds the video to the sessions folder and transcribes it with a prompt they wrote. That’s the whole manual step.

Everything after it is automatic — and it produces three things at once from a single act of curation.

The production loopDemo
<1 min
Human effort per session — add to folder, run the prompt.

A published page per session, with video, transcript, and description
A surface built for search engines and AI answer engines
A working assistant that answers members from that archive

Pricing · Three tools, one workflow

Start free. Pay when the library starts paying you back.

Every plan is month-to-month or yearly, and every product has a free tier you can use for as long as you like.

The browser extension that captures and structures.

Kurator Free

Chromium extension

$0

No card required

  • 100 posts
  • Unlimited folders
  • Shared folders
  • One KBucket export file
  • One sync folder / embed widget
  • 200 widget views per month
Get it now

Kurator Standard

Chromium extension

$4.99

per month, billed monthly or yearly

  • Unlimited links and folders
  • Shared folders
  • 1 export file
  • 3 publish collections
  • 5,000 widget views per month
Get it now

Kurator Agency

Chromium extension

$24.99

per month, billed monthly or yearly

  • Unlimited links and folders
  • Shared folders
  • unlimited export files
  • unlimited publish collections
  • Unlimited widget views
Get it now

The assistant grounded in what you curated.

KChat Free

Source-grounded assistant

$0

Log in with your Kurator ID

  • One chatbot
  • 20 responses
  • 2 retrains
  • Custom prompts
  • Choice of LLM
  • Analytics and chat logs
  • Leads list
Try KChat

KChat Basic

Source-grounded assistant

$20

per month

  • 1 chatbot
  • 2,000 responses
  • 20 retrains
  • Custom prompts
  • Choice of LLM
  • Analytics and chat logs
  • Leads list
Get it now

KChat Premium

Source-grounded assistant

$129

per month

  • 5 chatbots
  • 20,000 responses
  • 100 retrains
  • Custom prompts
  • Choice of LLM
  • Analytics and chat logs
  • Leads list
Get it now

The WordPress plugin that publishes it.

Upgrade from inside the app: open the Account menu at the top left of Kurator and click Upgrade. KChat uses the same Kurator ID.

Questions

Before you add Kurator.

What is Kurator, and how is it different from a bookmark manager?

Kurator is an orchestration layer for AI research. When you save a page, one of your own prompts runs right then and writes a structured description for the use you have in mind, such as an outreach brief, a transcript, or a competitive summary. You decide what matters, and Kurator records that decision. A bookmark manager gives you back a link. Kurator gives you research that your AI tools can use again.

Claude and ChatGPT already have memory. Why do I need Kurator?

Built-in memory remembers things about you, not your research. It also stays inside one assistant. That is why people re-upload the same files into every new thread and re-explain context every time they switch tools. Kurator keeps your research library outside any single assistant, so it is available in Claude, in ChatGPT, in NotebookLM, on your website, and in whatever tool you use next.

How is this different from AI memory tools and self-building knowledge bases?

Most memory tools save everything automatically and keep it inside their own app. Wiki-style systems rewrite their notes as new material comes in. Kurator is a library you curate: you choose what goes in, your own prompt structures it, and you can see and filter everything by folder, tag, author or publisher. The same folders then work in Claude, ChatGPT, NotebookLM, KChat and on your website, so your memory is not tied to one tool.

I use Obsidian. Do I need Kurator?

Obsidian Web Clipper can also run a prompt when you save a page, so capture alone isn’t the difference. The difference is what you can do afterward. Kurator keeps your prompts in one library you pick from on each save. Your folders are organized and filterable, so you can see what’s there at a glance. You can filter a folder and export it as a file for any LLM, connect the same library to both Claude and ChatGPT without running a local server, and publish it to your website or a KChat assistant. Obsidian remains a great place for your own writing; Kurator is where your sources go to work.

I already use NotebookLM (now Gemini Notebook). Why add Kurator?

NotebookLM does its best work when the sources you give it are good. The usual complaints are imports that sometimes fail, the 50-source limit, no folders or bulk management, answers that cite only a few of your sources, and notes that are hard to export. Kurator prepares sources before they reach NotebookLM. In our own test, a directly uploaded workshop video came back as an unpunctuated wall of text with misspelled names. The Kurator version had speaker labels, timestamps, and correct names.

Does Kurator work with Claude and ChatGPT?

Yes, both. You add Kurator’s Cloud MCP connector to Claude or ChatGPT as a custom connector. Either assistant can then search your library, read the descriptions you’ve saved, and save new sources into your folders with your prompts and tags. Because both read the same folders, you can run the same analysis in Claude and in ChatGPT and compare the answers, a quick way to test an assumption before you rely on it.

What can I save?

You can save anything your browser can display, including pages behind a login. That covers articles, LinkedIn posts, Reddit threads with their comments, YouTube videos (with transcripts), PDFs, and your own AI conversations from Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini. Each saved chat is a snapshot you can re-save after you ask follow-up questions.

Where is my data stored, and what does it cost?

Your library is stored in the cloud, which is what lets it sync and connect to Claude and ChatGPT. Prompts run with your own Gemini or OpenAI API key, which you add in AI Settings. You can export everything as JSON or XML at any time. Kurator is free for up to 100 links, and paid plans start at $4.99/month.

Ready to give your AI better memory?

Stop losing research in tabs, bookmarks, and chat histories.

Add Kurator and build a structured library every AI tool you use can query — instead of a pile of links you’ll never reopen and raw pages your AI turns into slop.

Research with AI. Save it to Kurator. Structure it once. Reuse it everywhere.

Contact · Customer relations matters to us

Talk to a person about your workflow.

Tell us what you’re trying to build and which product it touches. If it’s faster to show you, we’ll get on a call.

  • Watch first. Our video tutorials live on the content hub.
  • Ask KChat. The assistant in the corner of the site answers from our own documentation.
  • Read the docs. Setup, prompts, publishing — step by step.
  • Email us directly. [email protected]

Write to us

Captcha validation failed. If you are not a robot then please try again.

Goes straight to the team — no ticket queue.